Montgomery College General Education Program Revision Question 1:

Should a speech course be required for all students who complete 
a degree at Montgomery College?

Consider the Full Story - A Summary Section is followed by Details for each side below.
Please send your comments for publication on this issue to GenEd@montgomerycollege.edu 


Return to the General Education Main Page

New Are the Votes for Speech and Health Interrelated or Distinct?

Yes - one speech course should be required for 
all students.  This is a vote to keep the current 
speech course Foundation Requirement.

Keep Speech as a Requirement

Why Speech Communication Should Be a General Education Requirement at Montgomery College

Presented by Fritzi Bodenheimer,
Rockville Campus Speech Communication Professor

  1. Most of the nation’s community colleges require speech communication as a general education course. 

  2. Effective oral communication is the most important skill sought in job applicants and valued in new employees.

  3. Many college graduates lack the ability to communicate effectively in a variety of contexts. 

  4. Oral communication is the language of leadership, group teamwork, interpersonal relationships, and 
    intercultural communication.

  5. Responsible citizens in a mediated world must be able to speak and listen effectively and analytically. 

       What is Communication?

Communication.  According to the National Communication Association, the discipline of communication focuses on how people use verbal and nonverbal messages to generate meanings within and across various contexts, cultures, channels, and media. The field promotes the effective and ethical practice of human communication. 

1.  Most of the nation’s community colleges require speech communication as a general education course.

The Status of Communication Education in the Nation’s Community Colleges: Who Are We and What Do We Do? reports that “82.2 percent of public community colleges require at least one communication course to fulfill the general education requirement. In many cases, students may take one of several courses to fulfill their general education requirement whereas other colleges specify a single course.” (Engleberg et al, 2006)

The majority of community colleges recognized as leaders and models of good practices in higher education require speech communication as a general education requirement. California requires at least one basic communication course as part of its higher education system’s general education curriculum. In states such as Florida , Texas , and Ohio , the majority of community colleges require a communication course as part of the general education curriculum. (Engleberg et al, 2006)

2.  Oral communication courses prepare students for the modern work force and constitute the most important skill sought in job applicants and valued in new employees.

The Business-Higher Education Forum conducted a survey asking employers to identify the skills needed by college students preparing for the world of work. Oral communication was first on the list, followed by other communication competencies such as working in teams, leadership, interpersonal skills, and critical thinking. Written communication followed as 6th on the list.

The Association of American Colleges and Universities’ 2007 report, College Learning for the New Global Century, surveyed executives about the skills they look for in a job candidate. The top three choices were teamwork skills, critical thinking and analytical reasoning skills, and oral/written communication. Recent college graduates, 80 percent of whom are currently employed, ranked the same three skills as most important to their success as employees.

3.  Many college graduates lack the ability to communicate effectively, to work in teams, to interact with people from diverse backgrounds, to motivate and lead others, and to listen.

A study of Fortune 500 executives found that “newly hired graduates have impressive academic skills. However, graduates lack communication skills and the ability to work in teams and with people from diverse backgrounds.” (The Business-Higher Education Forum, 1997)

The Chronicle of Higher Education reports that college faculty members identify speaking, listening, problem solving, interpersonal skills, working in groups, and leading groups as essential skills for every college graduate. (Diamond, 1997)

4.  Oral communication is the language of leadership, group communication, interpersonal relationships, and intercultural communication.

  • Effective leaders rely on oral communication to motivate and manage others.

  • Effective group members rely on oral communication to collaborate and solve complex problems with others.

  • Effective personal and professional interactions rely on oral communication to develop, maintain, and strengthen interpersonal relationships.

  • Effective understanding of, respect for, and adaptation to other cultures rely on effective and ethical oral communication. 

All of the above competency areas are included in basic communication courses.

5.   Citizens in a mediated world and global marketplace must be able to listen accurately, analyze critically, and respond intelligently and          appropriately to oral and visual messages in a variety of contexts.

In his book, Are You Communicating? You Can’t Manage Without It, Donald Walton admonishes readers to take all the speech and communication courses they can because the world turns on communication.

Only speech communication courses teach classical and contemporary theory as well as research-based strategies and practical skills necessary for effective communication.

Only speech communication courses teach students how to communicate in interpersonal, group, presentational, and mediated contexts. Whereas other disciplines may use and require group work as well as oral and mediated presentations, only communication courses provide qualified instruction and reliable assessment in these competency areas. 

Only speech communication courses apply ethical communication standards to messages and promote personal responsibility for the consequences of communication.

Only speech communication courses encompass critical life skills necessary to:

s interpret and evaluate nonverbal communication.

s understand, respect, and adapt to others.

s develop and deliver effective oral presentations.

s influence opinions, attitudes, and behaviors.

s listen comprehensively, analytically, appreciatively, and empathically.

s analyze and resolve interpersonal conflicts.

s work effectively and efficiently in groups and teams.

s chair effective and efficient meetings.

s lead and motivate others in a variety of contexts.

s interact with family, friends, and colleagues.

s explain complex and controversial ideas.

s develop and analyze valid arguments.

s analyze and critique mediated messages.

s apply ethical standards to communication in a variety of contexts.

Only speech communication courses focus on students’ ability to analyze and express personal beliefs, attitudes, and opinions that adapt to the characteristics and needs of others.

References

Association of American Colleges and Universities (2007), College Learning for the New Global Century, Washington , DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities, p. 5. 

Business-Higher Education Forum in affiliation with the American Council on Education (January 1997), Spanning the chasm: Corporate and academic cooperation to improve work-force preparation. Washington , DC : American Council on Education.

Diamond, R. M. (August 1997), Designing and assessing courses and curricula,” Chronicle of Higher Education, B7.

Emanuel, R. (2005). The case for fundamentals of oral communication, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 29: 153-162.

Engleberg, I. , Emanuel, R., Van Horn, T., Bodary, D. (2007). The status of communication education in the nation’s community colleges: Who are we and what do we do? Manuscript under review for publication in Communication Education, a journal of the National Communication Association.

Walton, D. (1989). Are you communicating? You cannot manage without it. New York : McGraw-Hill.  

Return to the top of this page
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments from Faculty

Please send your comments for publication on this issue to GenEd@montgomerycollege.edu   

From: Farrell, Benjamin
Sent: Wed 3/12/2008 
To: Gen Ed
"Speech" Should Be Kept on the Foundation List

"When college graduates in a wide variety of fields were asked what abilities were
vital to their success, most respondents identified communication. In fact, the 
majority said that communication skills were more important than the major
subject they had studied in college."
(G. Goldhaber, Organizational Communication, 6 ed., p. 143) 

The importance of having good communication skills is no less important in today's technology oriented world. According to William Schaffer, business development officer for computer giant Sun Microsystems:
"If there's one skill that's required for success in this industry, it's communication skills." (Adler et al, 2008).

Yet, MC is seriously considering removing "Introduction to Human Communication" or "Speech" as it is commonly called from its required courses list. This course (SP108), as well as SP112, provides students with a thorough understanding of the communication process. Additionally, students learn how to effectively communicate at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, group, and public levels. Not only are they taught how to better understand themselves and others, but they are taught how to work with others and how to resolve conflicts in various contexts. Further, students are taught how to be more effective listeners and how to prepare, organize and deliver effective presentations.

This is an important and specialized field that should be taught by people schooled in the discipline. To suggest, therefore, that MC simply needs to "encourage all disciplines to incorporate oral communication activities," feeds the misconception that SP108 or SP112 only involves oral communication dimensions. Or, that anyone can teach this course. This is somewhat akin to students declaring they can hear, therefore, they are good listeners. Or, because they have been speaking all their lives, public speaking will be a breeze.

The broader point, however, is that effective communication is a necessary skill required for our students to be successful. Just talk to recruiters and professors from nearby institutions of higher learning and they will tell you that our students are well prepared and are sought after. Communication or "Speech" has been an integral part of preparing MC students for success. It is my belief that eliminating communication or "speech" from the list of required courses, will adversely affect the present success rate of our students.

Benjamin Osmond Farrell, Ph.D.
Adjunct Professor, SP108 & SP 112
Rockville Campus 

3/1/08 from Rockville Speech Faculty:

We appreciate Steve Leitz's service to the general education committee and his thoughtful consideration of the issues related to this important college decision.

However, his most recent comments are based on a fundamental error.  The course in question, SP 108, is called Introduction to Human Communication.  Telling students that this is a course in public speaking is misleading and it inaccurately frames the issue for our own discussions here as the vote approaches.

While Introduction to Human Communication contains a public speaking component, it is not a course in public speaking.  In Introduction to Human Communication, students learn how to:

  • be effective listeners
  • work in teams and lead groups
  • resolve conflicts in various contexts
  • organize and deliver presentations
  • and in general, make their daily interactions more satisfying and less frustrating. 

The very few students who have experience giving presentations learn how to better research and organize content and polish their delivery, skills even experienced speakers work on throughout their careers. 

All career choices—from scientists explaining their research to police officers calming a crowd—rely on communication to get the job done.  There is no better evidence for this than the hundreds of help wanted ads every day, from CEO to motorcycle mechanic, which list communication skills as essential for applicants.  For ten years running, communication skills have topped the list of desired traits in job applicants according to the National Association of Colleges and Employers.  It is no wonder that the first MHEC requirement is for our students to have proficiency in written and oral communication.  And therefore it is our duty, to provide students qualified instruction in these skills.  Not only will Introduction to Human Communication satisfy the MHEC requirement, the skills students gain in this class will serve them for a lifetime.
_______________________________________

2/13/08 from Professor Shahova:

Dear Colleagues,
I have been teaching all of the AELP and Russian courses at MC for ten years, so my experience has shown that YES, speech programs are absolutely necessary for the students seeking degrees. In fact,all our courses are interactive, and lack of proper oral communication is a serious impediment not only to students' progress in studies and also in their ability to responsibly express themselves as future professionals.
Thank you,
Adjunct Professor Iryna Shahova
___________________________________

2/12/08, from Professor Rueben-Powell:

"We lead in meeting economic and workforce development needs" - this is the penultimate line of our college mission.

In my regular job, as an alumni relations manager at a professional development non-profit organization that operates a prestigious international internship program, I often get job descriptions from HR personnel and recruiters of Fortune 500 companies keen to hire our alumni.
When I review the skills requirements and talk with the recruiters, I find that high on their wish lists are: excellent communication skills, strong verbal abilities, good presentation skills, interpersonal skills, good listening skills, perceptiveness.  Recently, at a talent evaluation
meeting, I learned that several companies now have formal one-minute presentations as part of the second interview process.  Yes, companies are looking for candidates who have competencies in the very areas encompassed
by the speech course we have here at MC.  A question for us to consider therefore is: will we be serving our students well by allowing them to exclude critical and required workforce skills from their general education palette? If indeed our goal is to meet workforce development needs,
eliminating Speech from our Gen Ed program is not an option.

Barbara Reuben-Powell
Adjunct Faculty, Speech 108
Rockville Campus

Return to the top of this page

From: Giron, Robert
Sent: Fri 3/23/2007 10:58 AM
To: Schleicher, Anne
Subject: Comments regarding the Gen Ed changes
 

With regard to removing Speech from the Foundation
List, I realize the committee wants to align our curriculum 
with other colleges in Maryland , but that doesn't 
necessarily mean it's a good thing. I strongly believe a 
Speech course is important for the development and success for our students and for them not to have course (an elective isn't enough) as part of their degree is a disadvantage. It seems to me that the focus of the educational experience at MC, for those who graduate or do not, should be that students leave MC with skills which will help them to succeed.
  

Being able to read, write, and communicate effectively are always on the "wish lists" of what perspective employers want from workers. Add to that critical thinking skills which students develop in such courses as English (composition/literature), Speech (communication and interpersonal skills), and Art/Creative Writing (creative thinking outside of the box). 

We at MC should be focused on what is best for the student in terms of an general education not necessarily abstract tables and charts of this or that in terms of graduation rates. If that is how the State is judging us, then we need to communicate our position more effectively.

_______________________________________

From: Bodenheimer, Fritzi
Sent: Mon 3/5/2007 3:29 PM
To: Gen Ed
Subject: Speech Communication

Like Professor Gray, I am concerned about the proposed removal of the communication course from the general education curriculum. At the most basic level, "written and oral communication" is the first of the mandated state competencies. It is also the first of the college's core academic outcomes noted on the general education website as "successful Montgomery College students will be effective communicators". How can we than remove the only course in which students receive
qualified instruction about the theory and practice of communication and still meet these goals?

Furthermore, SP 108 is more than just public speaking. We teach our students how to effectively work in teams, listen well, and conduct courteous and effective one-on-one conversations. We also ask our students to engage in significant research projects as they learn to craft arguments and develop thoughtful presentations.

Finally, with more and more technologies emerging for communicating, as Professor Gray points out, it is more important than ever to instruct our students how to communicate face to face, and how and when to effectively use mediated communication. It is no wonder that communication has topped the National Association of Colleges and Employers "what employers want survey" for ten years!

Fritzi Bodenheimer, 
Rockville , speech communication faculty
_____________________________________________
Return to the top of this page

From: Gray, James
Sent: Mon 2/19/2007 5:20 PM
To: Gen Ed
Subject: Speech courses

First, from the comparisons in the gen ed charts, it's difficult to determine how the "speech" course was defined. Not all courses in all schools would be simply labeled "speech." 

I surveyed the National Speech Communication web site to view communication requirements and programs across the country. The national trend is to require more communication courses not fewer. No longer requiring speech seems to buck the national trend.

Surveys of business skills deemed most necessary list communication at the top, specifically citing the ability to speak and to listen.

So, before a rush to judgment, "speech" needs to be defined, perhaps separately from "communication" or a combination of both, and in the perspective of the umbrella of communication curricula. 

Given today's influence of technology, specifically computers and cell phones, a majority of students in my classes have practically forgotten how to communicate face-to-face or before groups. 

Of course I'm going to stand up for my discipline. More importantly, I feel the college needs to support national education trends and business skills requirements. Eliminating these courses is a step backward.

Jim Gray
Speech Communication
Germantown Campus
Return to the top of this page

No - a vote of no means that speech courses will become an optional choice within the courses on the Humanities Distribution List.

Make Speech an Optional, Not a Required Course 

Should a Speech Course be required for all Montgomery College students who earn an Associate’s degree?   The Draft Proposal Suggests No.

A summary chart of general education requirements at thirteen Maryland public institutions indicates how speech courses transfer to each school (Attachment 7 of the Draft Proposal).  Currently, the foundation speech courses (SP 108 and 112) transfer to most Maryland public four-year institutions in the humanities general education category.

Only three MD schools specifically require a speech course: Coppin State University, University of Maryland , Eastern Shore, and the University of Baltimore .  Six of the thirteen schools list speech as one of the choices in either a Humanities or an Interdisciplinary and Emerging Issues (IE) general education category.  

This draft proposal to align MC’s general education distribution categories with Maryland State categories (described in the body of the proposal) moves speech from a required course into the Humanities Distribution area, where it would become a choice for students. 

MC’s speech course will transfer as a general education Humanities course to UMCP, and also to UMUC, our two primary transfer destinations.   When students take Speech 108 or 112 at MC, they may not be aware that it transfers to UMCP’s CORE, “Humanities Other” category because there is not a direct equivalency for the course at UMCP.  They often feel that this was a “wasted course” because it is not listed as a requirement at UMCP.  Students are especially concerned when they find that they were expected to take both a history and a literature for UMCP CORE requirements.  Under the current general education program, a student can take two Arts classes, one Humanities (a foreign language, for example), and SP 108, completely missing UMCP’s preferred literature and history requirements.   With so many general education courses to choose from under the current system, and knowing that the MHEC agreement will assure general education transfer, students are typically advised to take any courses without being aware that they could have fulfilled some specific general education requirements at MC prior to transfer. 

The new General Education Program proposal moves Speech into the Humanities category, where it becomes a choice for students rather than a requirement.  This plan gives students greater flexibility in selecting courses that meet the requirements of transfer destinations.  A survey of the 30 schools to which most MC students transfer (SP,HE,AR Chart, Attachment 9) both in-state and out-of-state, indicates that SP is a required course at only 10 out of the 30 schools. 

Making speech an option, rather than a requirement, does not mean that the General Education Program is ignoring the Written and Oral Communication Competency.  Rather, it puts more emphasis on that competency by encouraging courses in all disciplines to incorporate an oral communications activities including presentations, active class discussions and debates.

Speech remains an important requirement in many majors; for example, business, education and communication majors at most schools all require a SP course.  A vote for No to the Speech Requirement means that students will still be able to elect to take SP from among EN literature, foreign language, history, philosophy, and women’s studies course choices.

For faculty concerned about students who are not transferring, Speech can easily be a specific requirement within Humanities in Career Degrees.  

In summary, voting to eliminate Speech as a specific, separate requirement means that

  • Transfer students have greater flexibility of course selection to meet requirements of future destinations
  • The General Education Program will look for a broader inclusion of communications activities in all courses to fulfill the communication competency
  • Career degrees at Montgomery College can continue to require a speech course for students who will end their college educations at the two-year level
  • Programs like Nursing and Engineering, which currently are exempt from requiring a speech course, can allow students to take speech to fulfill a humanities distribution requirement.

--------------------------------------------------

Comments from Faculty

Please send your comments for publication on this issue to GenEd@montgomerycollege.edu 

Submitted by Steve Lietz, Counselor, Rockville on 2/20/08

In the past 3.5 years that I have been working with the General Education Committee I have grown in my knowledge and experience in promoting General Education to students.  In a personal sense I have also grown in my understanding of General Education in its meaning and intent.  My comments will appear under Speech and under transferability as both are very important to me.  Let me also note that there has been no direct student input into the changes being proposed for the General Education program and I in some ways represent what students have relayed to me through the advising and counseling process.  While the ideals of General Education are great, please keep in mind the realities of our students.  

There is not doubt that oral communication is an important trait and desired in many situations from personal communications to speaking to many people as a group.  Public speaking is also an important trait but not for everyone.  While we would like to promote democracy through the ability to speak well, that is only a part of the equation to being democratic.  We as human beings have our own feelings towards responsibilities and our role in a democratic society and that is developed from an innate desire to be part of the society in general.  I believe each one of us will rise to the level of comfort to be a participant as best we can.

My desire to see speech moved from a required course to a choice among Humanities options stems from the opinion that not everyone needs a human communications class.  Many students come to MC already able to make presentations and present themselves in front of groups of peers and do not need a formal class.  Others who are forced to take the speech class will never make a presentation in front of a group of more that one close friend.  It is my opinion that each major at the College determine what is in the best interest of their students based upon the transfer requirements.  Majors will still have the ability to include a human communication requirement in that particular major and other students can be advised to take a speech class as part of their curriculum in discussion with advisors at MC. 

Currently students who complete a degree at MC may find that upon arrival at a transfer institution that they need more general education requirements as speech does transfer as an elective but they still need to complete a history or literature class with the speech class not helping them.  In fact the cost in time and tuition may set a student back; please keep in mind the time and money pressure under which many of our students operate.

The proposal to make speech an elective or a specific requirement in each major speaks to student needs and transfer issues which are important considerations in spite of the desire to make each student everything MC thinks a student should be.  If we believe speech is important then it should be part of many classes across many majors assisting students in particularly speaking the language of their chosen field.

 

Return to the top of this page

Return to the General Education Main Page

New:  Are the votes interrelated or distinct?

Some confusion exists about the results of the Speech and Health votes.  If Speech becomes optional, not required, then the 3 credits from that course become available for other General Education categories.  The same is true if Health becomes optional and not required, another 1 - 3 credits become available to use in other Gen Ed categories.    The question has been asked, "If both SP and HE become optional, won't that give MC the opportunity to include a larger IE (Interdisciplinary and Emerging Issues) category where courses like Health AND other IE courses (technology-related courses) could both exist?"

The answer is that the majority of public schools in the state of Maryland only accept 3 credits of IE coursework at the maximum.  Yes, MC could create a 6-credit IE category, but students would essentially be taking one IE course and one General Elective that may not apply effectively to a General Education category upon transfer. 

All of this leads us back again to your philosophical view of which courses best provide a general education for students.  If you vote Yes to Speech and No to Health, Speech remains a Humanities credit and Health moves to a 1-3 IE category, which will include Health and other courses that might apply that meet the IE definition.

If you vote No to Speech and Yes to Health, then the 3 credits removed from Speech can be applied to additional general education categories by determination of each program.  For example, Business and many other degree programs can elect to keep Speech as a Humanities credit.  Many AAS programs may wish to maintain a Speech course requirement within Humanities.  Other programs may elect to apply the additional 3 credits to a Science, or History, or Mathematics requirement.  Under this same scenario, with Health remaining, the 1-3 credits of IE are devoted solely to a health course which is consistently applied to all programs.

In summary, voting No to SP and No to HE does not automatically 'free up' 6 credits which could then be used for two IE courses.  We urge you to think of the general education value of the two current foundation requirements, Speech and Health, and decide whether each course should continue to be required or whether one, or both of them, could be come optional, providing different choices for students.        

Anne Schleicher 3/2/08

 

Return to the General Education Main Page