Outline Moral and Political Philosophy
(Page references are to The Game of Philosophy)
1. Similarities between theories
PAGE 1
Moral liberalism and moral communitarianism (see pages 13-19)
-
Reject moral relativism
-
Search for a universal moral standard
-
Defend universal moral standards as grounds for preventing the arbitrary
and tyrannical treatment of some people by other people
PAGE 2
Strict and moderate communitarianism (23-32)
-
View the community as the primary moral agent and the determiner
of the good life
-
Regard the community as possessing rights and the individual as possessing
responsibilities to the community
-
Make the common good the basis of public policy decisions
-
Accept the prevention of offense and harm as the basis for legislation
-
Attempt to discover standards that can govern relationships among
people familiar to each other who share a notion of the good life in small
communities, such as city-states
-
Evaluate the character (or virtue) of a person
PAGE 3
Utilitarian and contractarian liberalism (45-58)
-
View the individual as the primary moral agent
-
View the individual as the determiner of the good life
-
Regard the individual as possessing rights and the society as having
responsibilities to the individual
-
Attempt to create rules that can govern relationships between strangers
in large societies, such as nation-states
-
Evaluate mainly a person’s actions, not his or her character
PAGE 4
Socialism and classical utilitarianism (49-54)
-
Evaluate an action by its likely results
-
Emphasize greater equality in the distribution of social goods
-
Defend the greatest good of the greatest number as the universal
standard of right action
-
Accept the prevention of harm as the only basis for legislation
-
Share with libertarians a materialist worldview
PAGE 5
Libertarian (43-45) and autonomy (45-48; 54-58) contractarianism
-
Evaluate an action by the kind of action it is--whether it violates
rights, for example.
-
Accept individual rights as the basis of a just society
-
Accept the preservation of rights as the basis for legislation
-
Regard the consent of the governed as the universal standard of right
action and just policy
2. Differences between theories
Moral liberalism vs. moral communitarianism (see pages 13-19)
Strict vs. moderate communitarianism (23-32)
Utilitarian vs. contractarian liberalism (45-58)
Socialism vs. classical utilitarianism (49-54)
Libertarian (43-45) vs. Autonomy (45-48; 54-58) contractarianism
PAGE 6
Moral liberalism vs. moral communitarianism
-
The individual determines the good life vs. the community determines
the good life
-
The individual possesses rights vs. the community possesses rights
-
The individual is the primary moral agent vs. the community is the
primary moral agent
-
Society is an aggregate of individuals vs. society is an organism
-
One’s action is the primary focus of evaluation vs. one’s character
is the primary focus of evaluation
-
One knows one’s place, abilities, and interests when making decisions
(the cards are up) vs. one suspends knowledge of one’s own place, abilities,
and interests when making decisions (the cards are down)
PAGE 7
Strict vs. moderate communitarianism
-
God’s will is the universal standard of morality vs. self-realization
is the universal standard of morality
-
Policy decisions are made by the one or the few vs. policy decisions
may be made by the many and must take into account the needs of the many
-
The leaders are the masters of the people vs. the leaders are the
servants of the people
-
Society is analogous to an individual organism vs. society is analogous
to a social organism, the family
-
Foundationalist vs. non-foundationalist
-
Commitment to a single worldview (dualist foundation) vs. non-commitment
to a single worldview (non-foundationalism)
-
The purpose of life has been established vs. the purpose of life
remains an open question
PAGE 8
Utilitarian vs. contractarian liberalism
-
The standard of “the greatest net benefit” vs. the standard of “consent
of the governed”
-
The general welfare is given greater emphasis vs. individual liberty
is given greater emphasis
-
The likely results of an action determine whether it is right vs.
the kind of action determines whether it is right
-
Altruism is the central motive of morality vs. self-interest is the
central motive of morality
PAGE 9
Socialism vs. classical utilitarianism
-
The general welfare of every person must be secured vs. the general
welfare of most people must be secured
-
A completely equal distribution of social goods must be secured vs.
a nearly equal distribution of social goods must be secured
-
Public ownership of the means of production is the ideal vs. private
ownership of some of the means of production is permissible
-
Rejection of inequality based on class distinctions vs. acceptance
of some inequality in the distribution of social goods
PAGE 10
Libertarian vs. autonomy-based contractarianism
-
Self-interest is the primary motive of morality vs. fair-mindedness
is the primary motive of morality
-
Natural rights vs. negotiated rights
-
Foundationalist vs. non-foundationalist
-
Commitment to a single worldview (materialist foundation) vs. non-commitment
to a single worldview (non-foundationalist)
That's all for now, folks.